so, i read this article. tell me what you think: http://uk.askmen.com/love/vanessa_100/118_love_secrets.html
friends with benefits:
1. Two friends who have a sexual realtionship without being emotionally involved. Typically two good friends who have casual sex without a monogomous relationship or any kind of commitment 2. Two friends with a very casual dating relationship. The benefits can be really good, long, flirty conversations; make-out sessions with no commitment; sex without commitment; etc. 3. A safe relationship, that mimics a real partnership but is void or greatly laking jealousy and other such emotions that come with a serious relationship. 4. A healthy, fun sexual relationship between two people...... Until one falls for the other, The friendship blows to pieces. And those two people find themselves worse off than they were before.
this whole concept of 'friends with benefits' is becoming more and more common. just like everything else, it has its pro's and its con's. the question is, do the pro's outweigh the con's? is it worth losing a friendship over?
the real question is: if you are not ready for or do not want a committment, should you be having sex in the first place?
honestly, i dont get the whole concept. it seems selfish to me. its selfish sex basically. what happens when the other person finds a boyfriend/girlfriend? you get pushed to the side. i guess thats why there cant be any emotion involved. what does it say about your worth? "Friends with benefits sounds enticing. And yes, real relationships are tough. But why settle for less than your potential? most of the time it never leads into a real relationship
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20050222/ai_n11834318#continue
the extreme opposite of friends with benefits is abstinence. its hard to live in a world full of sexual temptation and remain abstinent. is the reward greater in the long run?
tell me what you think about this whole topic! |